A Short Strangle involves simultaneously:
The two strikes are generally selected equidistant from the ATM strike.
Both options should have:
The structure is therefore the exact opposite of a Long Strangle.
Buy OTM Call + Buy OTM Put
Sell OTM Call + Sell OTM Put
A Long Strangle is based on the expectation that the market will make a large move.
A Short Strangle takes the opposite view.
The trader expects the underlying to remain within a range.
The strategy therefore works best when the market is relatively quiet and does not make a strong move in either direction.
In simple terms:
Long Strangle expects movement. Short Strangle expects stability.
Suppose the underlying is trading near an ATM strike.
You select:
Higher OTM Strike β Sell Call
and
Lower OTM Strike β Sell Put
The premiums from both options are received upfront.
Therefore:
Net Premium Received = Call Premium + Put Premium
This premium represents the maximum possible profit of the strategy.
The Short Strangle has three important zones.
Both options remain OTM at expiry.
The trader keeps the premiums received.
This is the most favourable outcome.
One of the options starts generating a loss.
The premium received initially provides some protection, but once the market crosses the relevant breakeven, the overall position moves into a loss.
The losses can become potentially unlimited because the short options have been sold.
This is the major risk of the strategy.
Consider the Short Strangle example from the source.
The selected strikes produce:
Therefore, if the market remains between 7,640 and 8,160 at expiry, the trader can retain the maximum profit of 60 points.
The maximum profit is straightforward.
Maximum Profit = Net Premium Received
In the example:
Maximum Profit = 60 points
This maximum profit is achieved as long as the underlying remains within the profitable range at expiry.
The Short Strangle has two breakeven points.
The calculations are the same as those used for a Long Strangle.
Upper Strike + Net Premium Received
Lower Strike β Net Premium Received
In the source example, these levels are:
Between these two levels, the strategy remains profitable.
Once the underlying rises beyond the upper breakeven, the short Call begins producing an overall loss.
The further the market rises, the greater the loss can become.
This is because a short Call carries potentially unlimited loss as the underlying price increases.
The premium received from the Call and Put provides only limited protection.
Therefore:
Above Upper Breakeven β Loss increases as the market rises
The opposite happens when the market falls sharply.
The short Put begins generating a loss.
Once the underlying moves below the lower breakeven, the loss exceeds the premium received.
The further the market falls, the larger the loss can become.
Therefore:
Below Lower Breakeven β Loss increases as the market falls
The main attraction of the Short Strangle is the range between the two breakeven points.
Using the example:
7,640 β Profitable Range β 8,160
As long as the market expires within this range, the strategy remains profitable.
At the centre of the range, the trader can retain the entire premium received.
The strategy is based on the observation that markets often remain within trading ranges for periods of time.
A stock moving sideways may repeatedly find:
In such circumstances, selling options outside the expected range can generate premium income.
The source specifically suggests identifying stocks that are trading within established ranges and selecting strikes outside the upper and lower boundaries.
Suppose a stock has repeatedly moved between a lower support level and an upper resistance level.
Instead of trying to predict the exact direction of the next move, a trader may construct a Short Strangle with:
The objective is for the stock to remain between those strikes until expiry.
If it does, both options can expire worthless and the premium received becomes the profit.
This is where the main risk comes in.
A stock that has been trading in a range can eventually:
A Short Strangle becomes vulnerable when such a breakout or breakdown occurs.
Therefore, when using the strategy around a trading range, the source specifically recommends watching the position closely for breakouts or breakdowns.
The source gives the example of Reliance, which had remained within a broad range of approximately 850 to 1,000 for an extended period.
In such a situation, strikes could theoretically be written outside the established range.
The underlying idea is:
Upper range β Sell Call above it
Lower range β Sell Put below it
If the stock remains inside the range, the premiums can be retained.
However, a decisive breakout or breakdown changes the risk profile significantly.
The Long and Short Strangle have broadly similar Greek behaviour.
Because the strategy uses OTM options on both sides, the combined Delta is generally close to zero.
However, the two option deltas may not be exactly equal.
Therefore, the position may not be strictly delta neutral.
Even so, the combined Delta is generally not expected to create a strong directional bias when the strikes are appropriately selected.
The key idea is:
The strategy is broadly direction-neutral at initiation.
The source explains that volatility has a similar effect on straddles and strangles.
For a Long Strangle, the preferred conditions are:
A Short Strangle takes the opposite market view.
The trader benefits when the expected large movement does not occur and the underlying remains within the selected range.
| Feature | Long Strangle | Short Strangle |
| Call | Buy OTM Call | Sell OTM Call |
| Put | Buy OTM Put | Sell OTM Put |
| Market expectation | Large move | Limited movement |
| Maximum profit | Potentially large | Net premium received |
| Maximum loss | Limited to premium paid | Potentially unlimited |
| Breakevens | Two | Two |
| Main risk | Market does not move enough | Market moves sharply |
The two strategies therefore represent almost opposite expectations about future market behaviour.
The Short Strangle offers an attractive feature:
You receive premium upfront.
But in return, you accept substantial risk if the underlying moves sharply.
Therefore:
Limited Profit
versus
Potentially Unlimited Loss
This trade-off should always be understood before considering the strategy.