The Bull Put Spread is similar to the Bull Call Spread in its overall payoff structure.
Both are designed for a moderately bullish view.
The major difference is that the Bull Put Spread uses Put options, whereas the Bull Call Spread uses Call options.
So, if you believe the market is likely to move higher, you have two possible spread approaches:
This naturally leads to an important question:
If both strategies have a similar payoff structure, why choose one over the other?
The answer mainly comes down to option premiums, volatility, and the position of the market within the expiry cycle.
The source highlights a particular situation where the Bull Put Spread can be attractive.
Imagine that:
In such a situation, it can make sense to use a Bull Put Spread to receive a net credit, rather than paying a net debit for a Bull Call Spread.
The basic thinking is:
The market has already fallen, put premiums are attractive, and you expect the market to stabilise or move higher.
The traditional Bull Put Spread uses two Put options:
You purchase an OTM Put option.
This requires you to pay a premium.
You sell an ITM Put option.
This allows you to receive a premium.
Therefore, the premium received from the ITM Put is generally greater than the premium paid for the OTM Put.
The difference becomes your net credit.
The basic structure is:
| Leg | Position | Option |
| Leg 1 | Buy | OTM Put |
| Leg 2 | Sell | ITM Put |
Both options should:
Consider a simple cash flow.
You buy an OTM Put and pay a premium.
At the same time, you sell an ITM Put and receive a premium.
If the premium received is greater than the premium paid, money flows into your account when the strategy is initiated.
That is a net credit.
Net Credit = Premium Received − Premium Paid
Because the Bull Put Spread generally results in a net credit, it is also called a Credit Spread.
This is the major difference from the Bull Call Spread:
| Bull Call Spread | Bull Put Spread |
| Uses Calls | Uses Puts |
| Net Debit | Net Credit |
| Pay money upfront | Receive money upfront |
| Moderately bullish | Moderately bullish |
Let us take the example from the source.
The strategy is constructed as follows:
The 7,700 Put is OTM.
Premium paid = ₹72
Since money leaves the account, this is a debit transaction.
The 7,900 Put is ITM.
Premium received = ₹163
Since money comes into the account, this is a credit transaction.
Net Credit = ₹163 − ₹72
Net Credit = ₹91
Therefore, ₹91 is received as the initial net credit from the strategy.
Once the strategy is established, Nifty can expire at any level.
To understand the payoff, let us examine different expiry scenarios.
This is below the lower strike of 7,700.
The intrinsic value of a Put at expiry is:
Max [Strike − Spot, 0]
Therefore:
Max [7,700 − 7,600, 0] = ₹100
You bought this Put for ₹72.
So the payoff from the long Put is:
₹100 − ₹72 = ₹28
The intrinsic value is:
₹7,900 − ₹7,600 = ₹300
But you sold this Put for ₹163.
Therefore, the payoff is:
₹163 − ₹300 = −₹137
₹28 − ₹137 = −₹109
So the strategy loses ₹109.
This is exactly at the lower strike.
It has zero intrinsic value.
Therefore, the entire ₹72 premium paid is lost.
Its intrinsic value is:
₹7,900 − ₹7,700 = ₹200
You received ₹163 for selling it.
Therefore:
₹163 − ₹200 = −₹37
₹163 − ₹200 − ₹72 = −₹109
So once again, the strategy loses ₹109.
Now the market is at the higher strike.
Both Put options expire worthless.
Therefore:
So:
Net Payoff = ₹163 − ₹72 = ₹91
The strategy makes a ₹91 profit.
This is above the higher strike.
Again, both Put options expire worthless.
Therefore:
Net Payoff = ₹163 − ₹72 = ₹91
The strategy again makes ₹91.
| Nifty Expiry | 7,700 PE | 7,900 PE | Net Payoff |
| 7,600 | ₹100 intrinsic | ₹300 intrinsic | −₹109 |
| 7,700 | ₹0 intrinsic | ₹200 intrinsic | −₹109 |
| 7,900 | ₹0 intrinsic | ₹0 intrinsic | +₹91 |
| 8,000 | ₹0 intrinsic | ₹0 intrinsic | +₹91 |
This table reveals the basic behaviour of the Bull Put Spread.
The strategy becomes profitable.
The loss is limited.
The profit reaches its maximum and remains capped.
The maximum profit from the Bull Put Spread is equal to the net credit received.
Maximum Profit = Net Credit
In our example:
Maximum Profit = ₹91
This maximum profit occurs when the market expires at or above the higher strike.
The maximum loss is limited.
First calculate the spread.
Spread = Higher Strike − Lower Strike
In our example:
₹7,900 − ₹7,700 = ₹200
Now subtract the net credit:
Maximum Loss = Spread − Net Credit
Therefore:
₹200 − ₹91 = ₹109
So the maximum loss is ₹109.
This is an important feature of the strategy.
Even if the market falls sharply below the lower strike, the loss does not continue increasing indefinitely.
The breakeven point is the level where the strategy makes neither a profit nor a loss.
For a Bull Put Spread:
Breakeven = Higher Strike − Net Credit
In our example:
₹7,900 − ₹91 = ₹7,809
Therefore, the strategy starts making a profit when Nifty expires above ₹7,809.
The source's payoff discussion illustrates this same relationship between the higher strike, net credit, and breakeven.
For a Bull Put Spread, remember these three formulas:
Net Credit
Spread − Net Credit
Higher Strike − Net Credit
These three numbers allow you to quickly understand the basic risk-reward structure before entering the strategy.
Yes.
The traditional Bull Put Spread uses:
Buy OTM Put + Sell ITM Put
But the specific OTM and ITM strikes you select can vary.
The spread is simply the difference between the two strike prices.
The source gives several combinations to demonstrate how changing the strikes changes the risk-reward profile.
Consider the following examples:
| Long OTM Put | Short ITM Put | Spread | Net Credit | Max Loss | Max Profit | Breakeven |
| 7,500 PE | 7,700 PE | ₹200 | ₹75 | ₹125 | ₹75 | ₹7,625 |
| 7,400 PE | 7,800 PE | ₹400 | ₹158 | ₹242 | ₹158 | ₹7,642 |
| 7,500 PE | 7,800 PE | ₹300 | ₹136 | ₹164 | ₹136 | ₹7,664 |
The important observation is that changing the strikes changes the risk-reward ratio.
Suppose you have a high level of conviction that your moderately bullish view is correct.
You may choose a larger spread.
A larger spread means the distance between the two strikes is greater.
This increases the potential maximum profit.
However, there is an important trade-off.
A larger spread also changes the breakeven and increases the maximum possible loss.
So you should not simply choose the widest possible spread.
The source summarises the relationship as:
Higher spread → Higher profit potential → Higher breakeven point
If your conviction is lower, a smaller spread may be more appropriate.
The strategy is especially relevant when the following conditions come together:
Market has fallen + Put premiums are high + Volatility is elevated + You expect the market to hold up
This combination can make the credit received from selling the ITM Put attractive enough to justify the strategy.
However, the strategy still has defined downside risk, so the trader must understand the maximum loss before entering.
Both strategies express a moderately bullish view, but their construction is different.
| Feature | Bull Call Spread | Bull Put Spread |
| Options used | Calls | Puts |
| Initial cash flow | Net debit | Net credit |
| Maximum profit | Limited | Limited |
| Maximum loss | Limited | Limited |
| Basic bullish view | Moderate | Moderate |
| Particularly useful when | Call premiums make sense | Put premiums are attractive |
The Bull Put Spread becomes particularly interesting after a market decline when Put premiums have expanded and volatility is elevated.