We have seen that Implied Volatility can differ across Strike Prices.
However, the difference is not always symmetrical between Calls and Puts.
When the IV of options changes depending on the Strike Price, creating a noticeable difference between the two sides of the option chain, it is referred to as Volatility Skew.
In simple terms:
Volatility Skew = Difference in Implied Volatility across different Strike Prices or option types.
The market does not assign the same probability or risk to every possible price movement.
For example, traders may be more concerned about a sharp fall in an underlying than a sharp rise.
In such a situation, OTM Put Options may attract greater demand.
Higher demand for these Puts can push their premiums higher.
Since option premiums are linked to Implied Volatility, their IV can also become higher than that of comparable Calls.
This creates a skew.
One common form of skew occurs when OTM Put Options have higher IV than comparable OTM Call Options.
This can happen because investors may be willing to pay more for downside protection.
For example, consider an underlying trading at ₹10,000.
Suppose:
The Put has higher implied volatility.
This indicates that the market is pricing greater volatility or demand for protection on the downside.
Institutional investors and other market participants often use Put Options to protect portfolios against sharp declines.
When demand for downside protection increases:
Put Demand ↑
Put Premium ↑
Put IV ↑
This can make OTM Puts appear more expensive relative to OTM Calls.
Volatility skew is not permanent.
It can change depending on:
During calm market conditions, the difference between Put and Call IV may be relatively small.
During periods of stress, downside Put IV can rise sharply.
Imagine the following simplified option chain:
| Strike | Call IV | Put IV |
| 9,500 | 24% | 32% |
| 10,000 | 20% | 21% |
| 10,500 | 22% | 25% |
The Put IV is higher at several strikes.
This tells us that the market is assigning relatively greater volatility to downside options.
The exact interpretation depends on the underlying and market conditions.
These two concepts are related but not identical.
IV forms a roughly symmetrical smile across Strike Prices.
IV is noticeably different across strikes, with one side of the distribution having higher IV than the other.
In real markets, volatility curves may not form a perfect smile.
They can be tilted or distorted depending on market demand and risk.
Skew provides information about how volatility is distributed across Strike Prices.
Suppose two options have similar expiry and similar distance from the current price.
If one has significantly higher IV, it may indicate:
This can be useful when comparing option strategies.
Consider an option seller comparing two OTM options.
One has significantly higher IV than the other.
The higher IV option may offer a larger premium.
But that higher premium may exist because the market considers that side of the risk more significant.
Therefore:
Higher IV → Higher Premium
does not automatically mean:
Higher IV → Better Trade
The additional premium may simply compensate for additional perceived risk.
When analysing an option chain, do not look only at the absolute IV.
Compare:
This can reveal how the market is pricing different types of risk.
A common mistake is assuming that the option with the highest IV is automatically overpriced.
High IV can reflect genuine market demand or higher perceived risk.
Before calling an option expensive, compare its IV with:
Volatility Skew shows that the market does not price volatility equally across all Strike Prices.
It can provide useful information about where traders are willing to pay more for protection or exposure.