So far, we have learned about:
Now we can use these concepts for actual trading decisions.
The source focuses on two practical applications:
The purpose is not to predict the market with certainty, but to use probability and historical volatility to make decisions more systematically.
One of the biggest challenges for an option writer is selecting the Strike Price.
The trader wants to:
There is always a risk that the market will move against the position.
However, volatility and normal distribution can help the trader estimate how far the underlying could potentially move.
This can make Strike selection more structured instead of relying only on guesswork.
Suppose the current price of an underlying is ₹10,000.
Historical volatility suggests that the underlying has a certain expected range over the remaining period.
Instead of randomly choosing an OTM Strike, the trader can first calculate a statistical range.
For example:
Approximately 68% of outcomes are expected to fall within this range under the normal-distribution assumption.
Approximately 95% of outcomes fall within this wider range.
The trader can then compare these ranges with available Strike Prices.
A Strike that lies further away from the expected range may have a lower probability of being reached, although it can never be considered risk-free.
Consider an underlying trading at ₹10,000.
A Call Strike at ₹10,100 is relatively close to the current price.
Another Call Strike at ₹10,500 is much further away.
If the calculated volatility-based range suggests that the underlying is likely to remain below ₹10,500 during the relevant period, the second strike may appear more attractive to an option writer.
However, the further strike will generally offer a different premium.
Therefore, the trader must balance:
Distance from Spot + Probability + Premium Received
This is the basic idea behind using volatility for Strike selection.
A volatility-based calculation does not guarantee that the underlying will remain within the estimated range.
Markets can experience:
The normal distribution framework is therefore a probability tool, not a guarantee.
Events beyond the expected range can occur, including very unusual moves sometimes described as Black Swan events.
Volatility can also be used to determine a more systematic stop-loss.
A fixed stop-loss may not always make sense for every underlying.
For example, a ₹50 movement may be huge for one stock but completely normal for another.
Volatility helps account for this difference.
A more volatile underlying can justify a wider price range, while a less volatile underlying may require a narrower range.
The basic idea is:
Stop-Loss Distance should reflect the underlying's normal price movement.
Suppose two stocks are both trading at ₹1,000.
Normally moves only 1% in a day.
Normally moves around 4% in a day.
Using exactly the same stop-loss percentage for both may not be appropriate.
A small movement in Stock B may simply be normal volatility rather than a genuine indication that the trade is going wrong.
Therefore, volatility can help traders distinguish between:
Normal Price Fluctuation
and
A Meaningful Adverse Move
Suppose a trader enters a position at ₹1,000.
Historical volatility suggests that a normal daily movement could be around 2%.
A 2% move equals:
₹1,000 × 2% = ₹20
The trader could use this information while determining an appropriate risk level.
The exact stop-loss should depend on the trading strategy, position size and risk tolerance. Volatility simply provides a statistical reference point.
These two applications are connected.
Volatility helps estimate how far the underlying could potentially move.
Volatility helps estimate what could be considered a normal movement.
Therefore, both decisions can be based on the same underlying concept:
Understanding the expected range of price movement.
Instead of thinking:
"This strike looks far enough."
A trader can think:
"Based on volatility and the expected range, how far is this strike from the current price?"
Similarly, instead of thinking:
"I'll keep a 2% stop-loss."
The trader can ask:
"Is a 2% movement normal for this underlying?"
This is the shift from instinct-based trading towards model thinking.
Volatility is most useful when it helps answer a specific trading question.
For example:
The objective is not to eliminate risk, but to understand and manage it better.
A common mistake is selecting an option strike only because it is far away from the current price.
Distance alone is not enough.
The trader should also consider the underlying's volatility, the time remaining and the premium being received.
A strike that looks far away under normal conditions may not be far away during a period of unusually high volatility.
Volatility converts a simple price view into a range-based decision.
It can help traders select option strikes more systematically and create stop-loss levels that account for the normal movement of the underlying.